IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pei/journl/v24y201625p61-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pareto and the Missing Concept of Prudence

Author

Listed:
  • Alasdair Marshall

    (University of Southampton - Southampton Business School)

Abstract

The article proposes that Pareto’s Treatise on General Sociology deserves to be read with an ethical concern to establish how it can help its readers become more prudent. This concern is accorded urgency in view of the fact that the book offers ideas which chime with those held by growing numbers of online extremist political activists loosely linked to what is increasingly called the ‘alt right’. The central argument is that the full ‘mirror for princes’ guidance value of the text can be realised when readers disregard its Machiavellian-Paretian psychological realism which over-emphasises the influences of animal spirits on thought and behaviour, and instead turn to a much broader and ethically richer vision of human behaviour based on prudence

Suggested Citation

  • Alasdair Marshall, 2016. "Pareto and the Missing Concept of Prudence," Il Pensiero Economico Italiano, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 24(2), pages 61-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:pei:journl:v:24:y:2016:2:5:p:61-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.libraweb.net/articoli.php?chiave=201606302&rivista=63
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pareto; Machiavelli; ‘mirror for princes’; prudence; phronesis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pei:journl:v:24:y:2016:2:5:p:61-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlo Cristiano (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.libraweb.net .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.