IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02121-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic partner election: proposal for a Binary Logistic Model for the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Podadera Rivera

    (Universidad de Málaga)

  • Anna Garashchuk

    (Universidad de Málaga)

Abstract

The European Union awarded the special status of strategic partner to ten states. Its key partners are dissimilar in political philosophies and structure, power status, ethical values, economic development, unequal in size and mineral reserves. Some of them are traditional Post-Second World War partners while the others have established recent partnerships in a new multipolar world order. However, from the very beginning the EU Conception of Strategic Partnership was just an assemblage of political statements without any official definition and clear established criteria for being chosen as a strategic partner. In this regard, this paper aims to analyze the strategic partnership phenomenon in EU Foreign Policy and provide our own definition of the term with a view to underpin it subsequently by common criteria. Based upon obtained main components the Binary Logistic Model was applied, which not only did allow to make the election of EU strategic partners more science-based but also propose the potential EU partners.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Podadera Rivera & Anna Garashchuk, 2023. "Strategic partner election: proposal for a Binary Logistic Model for the European Union," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02121-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02121-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucyna Czechowska, 2022. "Joint Bodies and the Regularization of Strategic Interaction: A Comparison of the European Union's Strategic Partnerships with Japan and India," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1144-1164, July.
    2. Sergey Lavrov, 2013. "State of the Union Russia–EU: Prospects for Partnership in the Changing World," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51, pages 6-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guschin, Evgeniy (Гущин, Евгений) & Istomin, R. (Истомин, Р.) & Ptashkina, M. G. (Пташкин, М. Г.) & Taganov, B. V. (Таганов, Б. В.), 2015. "Analysis of the Effects of Liberalization of Foreign Trade of the Russian Federation in the Framework of Russia's Accession to the WTO and Regional Economic Integration [Анализ Последствий Либерали," Working Papers mak15n1, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, revised 01 Oct 2015.
    2. Evgeny Gushchin & Boris Taganov & M. Ptashkina & Roman Istomin, 2015. "Анализ Последствий Либерализации Внешней Торговли Российской Федерации в Рамках Присоединения России К Вто и Региональной Экономической Интеграции (Analysis of the Consequences of the RF Foreign Trade," Working Papers 137, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2015.
    3. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mitchell A. Orenstein & R. Daniel Kelemen, 2017. "Trojan Horses in EU Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 87-102, January.
    4. Amelia Hadfield & Daniel Fiott, 2014. "Relations with the Rest of the World: From Chaos to Consolidation?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 170-185, November.
    5. Thomas Gehring & Kevin Urbanski & Sebastian Oberthür, 2017. "The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 727-743, July.
    6. Azimzhan Khitakhunov & Bulat Mukhamediyev & Richard Pomfret, 2017. "Eurasian Economic Union: present and future perspectives," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 59-77, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02121-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.