IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v65y2014i5p694-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new method for evaluating decision making units in DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Dariush Khezrimotlagh

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Shaharuddin Salleh

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Zahra Mohsenpour

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

This paper provides a new structure in data envelopment analysis (DEA) for assessing the performance of decision making units (DMUs). It proposes a technique to estimate the DEA efficient frontier based on the Arash Method in a way different from the statistical inferences. The technique allows decisions in the target regions instead of points to benchmark DMUs without requiring any more information in the case of interval/fuzzy DEA methods. It suggests three efficiency indexes, called the lowest, technical and highest efficiency scores, for each DMU where small errors occur in both input and output components of the Farrell frontier, even if the data are accurate. These efficiency indexes provide a sensitivity index for each DMU and arrange both inefficient and technically efficient DMUs together while simultaneously detecting and benchmarking outliers. Two numerical examples depicted the validity of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Shaharuddin Salleh & Zahra Mohsenpour, 2014. "A new method for evaluating decision making units in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(5), pages 694-707, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:65:y:2014:i:5:p:694-707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v65/n5/pdf/jors201340a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v65/n5/full/jors201340a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:65:y:2014:i:5:p:694-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.