IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/gpprii/v40y2015i1p159-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of the Geographic Aggregation of Catastrophic Risk†

Author

Listed:
  • Randy E Dumm

    (Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110, USA)

  • Mark E Johnson

    (Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110, USA)

  • Charles C Watson

    (University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2370, USA)

Abstract

The debate in the United States about establishing a mechanism for insuring catastrophic wind risk at the national level pre-dates the intense 2004–2005 hurricane seasons. The prevailing argument against establishing any larger risk pool is that it would create a subsidy for the higher risk exposures. To determine whether benefits do accrue by aggregating catastrophic risk across increasingly wide geographic areas, the paper uses catastrophe models to evaluate the behavior of residential property portfolios within the state of Florida and for a larger risk pool that includes multiple combinations of coastal states in the southeastern United States. We find that geographic aggregation does not inherently subsidise high-risk exposures, reduces uncertainty, and reduces required reserves relative to total exposure for the least frequent and more severe events. This finding holds true for all state combinations evaluated in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Randy E Dumm & Mark E Johnson & Charles C Watson, 2015. "An Examination of the Geographic Aggregation of Catastrophic Risk†," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 40(1), pages 159-177, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:40:y:2015:i:1:p:159-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v40/n1/pdf/gpp201420a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v40/n1/full/gpp201420a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:40:y:2015:i:1:p:159-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.