IFRS* Phase II and Solvency II: Key Issues, Current Debates
AbstractThe paper discusses key issues and reflects the current debates around two important regulatory projects: Solvency II and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Phase II. The Solvency II project is based on an economic balance sheet and proposes an economic valuation of insurance liabilities that is very close to the European industry position on assessment of risks and solvency requirements based on how the business is managed. One key element is still under debate: diversification across portfolios. The industry considers that the entity's own diversification must be reflected in the valuation of the insurance liabilities while the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors’ has referred to an empty undertaking. IFRS Phase II can appear to be an approach similar to Solvency II, but actually is based on fundamental flaws, excluding future cash flows, and insurers actions, referring to a theoretical market participant efficiency instead of the entity's specific data for expenses, unbundling artificially insurance and financial components, taking into account insurer's own credit standing and adding a service margin to the risk margin. The diverging timetables of IFRS and Solvency II lead to a risk that IFRS and solvency could be non-aligned and increase the danger that IFRS for insurance may be distant from the economics of the business. A consensus within the industry is therefore crucial to facilitate the progress of the international standard for insurance accounting, which would give a true and fair presentation of the economics of the business. The Geneva Papers (2009) 34, 47–55. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.42
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Palgrave Macmillan in its journal The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice.
Volume (Year): 34 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/
Postal: Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Elizabeth Gale).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.