A Critical Analysis of the Solvency II Proposals
AbstractThe European Commission has recently published the Solvency II proposals with the objective to fundamentally review the insurance supervisory framework. We test the Solvency II framework against seven criteria developed by Cummins et al. describing how best to duplicate the operation of an efficient and complete market. We conclude that Solvency II satisfies most of these criteria. We recommend a more balanced framework between Pillar I and II/III. In this way, Pillar II/III will resolve some of the problems in Pillar I, such as inappropriate incentives of the capital requirements formulae (hard solvency capital requirement limit, modular minimum capital requirement). Areas for further work on Pillars II and III are operational and business risk, long-term effects of strategic decision-making. The Geneva Papers (2008) 33, 193–206. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.2
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Palgrave Macmillan in its journal The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice.
Volume (Year): 33 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/
Postal: Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Elizabeth Gale).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.