IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v28y2016i2p252-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State or Regime? The Impact of Institutions on Welfare Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Dietrich

    (University of Essex, Colchester, UK)

  • Michael Bernhard

    (University of Florida, Gainesville)

Abstract

A substantial literature connects democracy with superior welfare outcomes. A recent wave of publications takes issue with this finding, positing that globalization, authoritarian legacies and sample bias undermine the posited relationship and the statistical findings that support this thesis. We introduce a new dimension into this debate, state capacity. Using a disaggregated Weberian approach to the state, which focuses on its ability to maintain order and to effect human development through bureaucratic means, we explore the relationship of state capacity with three critical welfare outcomes, infant mortality, education, and basic nutrition. We establish the importance of these two elements of state capacity for these specific welfare outcomes through a time-series cross-sectional analysis of developing nations covering the period of the 1980s to the 2000s. We also do not find strong evidence that democracy affects either infant mortality or basic nutrition in models that incorporate state capacity. There is evidence that democracy does positively effect education outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Dietrich & Michael Bernhard, 2016. "State or Regime? The Impact of Institutions on Welfare Outcomes," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(2), pages 252-269, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:28:y:2016:i:2:p:252-269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v28/n2/pdf/ejdr201470a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v28/n2/full/ejdr201470a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:28:y:2016:i:2:p:252-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.