IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v27y2024i1d10.1057_s41299-023-00158-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calls to Action: The Dangers of Negative CSR Information and Stakeholder Punishments

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa D. Lewin

    (SUNY Old Westbury)

  • Danielle E. Warren

    (Rutgers, The State University of NJ)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to experimentally examine stakeholder punishments in response to poor CSR performance communicated through either internal or external channels. Across two experiments, we find that receiving negative CSR information communicated through internal channels (CSR reports) or external channels (news articles) causes individuals to punish a firm (less investment, lower employment interest, buy less, post negative comments on social media). Furthermore, we find sensitivity to a conflict of information from internal and external channels, which increased Calls to Action on social media. This is a concern for firms because such social media posts can elicit further punishments from stakeholders and inflict reputational costs on the firm. The findings of our studies suggest that firms should accurately report CSR performance, especially if external channels are likely to communicate negative CSR information regarding the firm because such conflicting information can elicit a strong online backlash.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa D. Lewin & Danielle E. Warren, 2024. "Calls to Action: The Dangers of Negative CSR Information and Stakeholder Punishments," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:27:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41299-023-00158-y
    DOI: 10.1057/s41299-023-00158-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41299-023-00158-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41299-023-00158-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:27:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41299-023-00158-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.