IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/buseco/v42y2007i2p31-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Propensity To Sue: Why Do People Seek Legal Actions?

Author

Listed:
  • Fredrick C Dunbar
  • Faten Sabry

Abstract

Tort costs as a fraction of U.S. GDP have increased overv three-fold in the past 50 years, now hovering slightly above two percent. Although there has been much ink spilled blaming the plaintiffs' bar and so-called hellhole jurisdictions, less has been written about the behavior and attitudes of individual plaintiffs. Using a unique survey from the RAND Corporation, this paper empirically analyzes the perceptual and economic factors that affect the decision of an injured party to seek legal action. We find that, independent of economic incentives, perception of fault is the most important factor in the decision to make a claim. On average, a person who blames another person or firm for his or her injury is four times more likely to claim regardless of the type of injury involved. Unsurprisingly, the severity of injury—either as perceived by the claimant or as measured by actual injury during the accident—is another key factor in explaining the claiming rate. Also, as expected, there is a negative relation between age and claiming behavior. Somewhat unexpectedly, whether the person has had experience with filing before has no independent effect on the decision to claim.Business Economics (2007) 42, 31–42; doi:10.2145/20070203

Suggested Citation

  • Fredrick C Dunbar & Faten Sabry, 2007. "The Propensity To Sue: Why Do People Seek Legal Actions?," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 42(2), pages 31-42, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:42:y:2007:i:2:p:31-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/be/journal/v42/n2/pdf/be200711a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/be/journal/v42/n2/full/be200711a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sasha Romanosky & David Hoffman & Alessandro Acquisti, 2014. "Empirical Analysis of Data Breach Litigation," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 74-104, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:42:y:2007:i:2:p:31-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.