IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/assmgt/v7y2006i1d10.1057_palgrave.jam.2240201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wealth management: The relative importance of asset allocation and security selection

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Hlawitschka

    (Dolan School of Business, Fairfield University)

  • Michael Tucker

    (Dolan School of Business, Fairfield University)

Abstract

Many studies have suggested that being in the ‘right’ asset category is more important than being in the right asset, ie asset allocation is more important than security selection. Brinson et al. (Financial Analysts Journal, 47(3), 40–48, 1991), for example, claim that approximately 91 per cent of certain portfolio returns can be attributed to the portfolio's asset allocation. This paper differs from earlier studies in that a portfolio's attractiveness is measured based on the ex ante expected utility that an investor associates with a specific portfolio. Most other studies measure a portfolio's attractiveness based on comparisons of ex post results, when it is too late for investors to make their investment choice. The results are very different from those of earlier studies. Portfolios comprising an optimal mix of stock and bond indexes provide much less expected utility than a portfolio comprising an optimal mix of specific stocks and specific bonds. Thus, security selection is found to be far more important than asset allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Hlawitschka & Michael Tucker, 2006. "Wealth management: The relative importance of asset allocation and security selection," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 49-59, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:7:y:2006:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jam.2240201
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240201
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walter Hlawitschka & Michael Tucker, 2008. "Utility comparison between security selectors, asset allocators and equally weighted portfolios within a selected ETF universe," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 67-72, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:7:y:2006:i:1:d:10.1057_palgrave.jam.2240201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.