IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v35y2021i3p652-680..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productivity and Health: Physical Activity as a Measure of Effort

Author

Listed:
  • Oladele Akogun
  • Andrew Dillon
  • Jed Friedman
  • Ashesh Prasann
  • Pieter Serneels

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between physical activity and individual productivity among agricultural workers paid on a piece-rate basis. In the context studied, physical activity has a clear correspondence with worker effort. Agricultural workers’ physical activity is directly observed from accelerometer data and is robustly associated with their daily productivity. In addition the impact of a health intervention, which provides malaria testing and treatment, on physical activity and productivity, indicates that the increased daily productivity of workers who are offered this program is explained by worker effort reallocation from low-intensity to high-intensity work within a fixed time period. This demonstrates, in settings when individual productivity is observed, that physical activity measures can help disentangle productivity effects due to effort. When productivity is unobserved, physical activity measures may proxy for individual productivity in physically demanding tasks. The challenges and limitations of physical activity measurement using accelerometers is discussed including their potential use for alternative contexts and the importance of field and data analysis protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Oladele Akogun & Andrew Dillon & Jed Friedman & Ashesh Prasann & Pieter Serneels, 2021. "Productivity and Health: Physical Activity as a Measure of Effort," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 35(3), pages 652-680.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:35:y:2021:i:3:p:652-680.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhaa011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:35:y:2021:i:3:p:652-680.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.