IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v34yi3p575-596..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mine, Yours or Ours? The Efficiency of Household Investment Decisions: An Experimental Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anandi Mani

Abstract

This article sheds light on the impact on household investment efficiency of a social norm that a man should not earn less than his wife. The experiment distinguishes this impact from that of spouses’ desire for control over household resources. Both husbands and wives are found to sacrifice household income (efficiency) for greater control; but, consistent with this social norm, husbands alone behave inefficiently if assigned a smaller income share than their spouse. The evidence suggests spiteful behavior among such husbands: they are willing to undercut their own income to narrow the gap with their wives’ earnings. The magnitude of husbands’ inefficiency influenced by this social norm is comparable to that when husbands have the least control over household earnings. These results, taken together with evidence from developed countries, show that this social norm has a persistent effect on household efficiency, distinct from spouses’ economic concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Anandi Mani, 0. "Mine, Yours or Ours? The Efficiency of Household Investment Decisions: An Experimental Approach," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 34(3), pages 575-596.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:34:y::i:3:p:575-596.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhz043
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:34:y::i:3:p:575-596.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.