IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v13y2010i1p95-113..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confucian Morals and the Making of a ‘Good Wife and Wise Mother’: From ‘Between Husband and Wife there is Distinction’ to ‘As Husbands and Wives be Harmonious’

Author

Listed:
  • Sumiko SEKIGUCHI

Abstract

The most important text in the ‘Lessons for Women’ genre of the Tokugawa era (1600–1867) was the ‘Greater Learning for Women’. But this text remained too vague to be reliable. In the absence of clear norms to which ‘womanly cultivation’ could be referred, a need to replace it was strongly felt during the Tokugawa era's latter part. This project, however, came to fruition only in the wake of the Meiji Renovation. Fukuzawa Yukichi and Empress Haruko played pivotal roles in this regard. The Imperial Rescript on Education, issued in 1890, centered on an enumeration of virtues closely resembling the ‘five ethical relations’ of classical Confucianism. Here, however, the classical phrase ‘Between husband and wife there is distinction’ was no longer used; the stipulation ‘As husbands and wives be harmonious’ is found in its stead. Inoue Tetsujirō, in his semi-official commentary, explained this phrase to mean ‘obedience’ of the wife to her husband and ‘division of labor’ between them. Subsequently, the phrase ‘a good wife and wise mother’ established itself as the standard for womanhood in modern Japan. But this cannot be understood simply as a ‘product of modernity’ owed to Western influence. It also had roots in the notion of a ‘wise wife and wise mother’ absorbed from Chinese thought during the final years of Tokugawa rule, against a background of marked ambivalence and fluctuation that had characterized gender norms in Tokugawa Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumiko SEKIGUCHI, 2010. "Confucian Morals and the Making of a ‘Good Wife and Wise Mother’: From ‘Between Husband and Wife there is Distinction’ to ‘As Husbands and Wives be Harmonious’," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 95-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:95-113.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyp046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:13:y:2010:i:1:p:95-113.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.