IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i5p739-750..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer effects of the young returnee scientists: Evidence from the state key laboratories in China
[Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators]

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Yang
  • Xinlan Cai
  • Tingsong Li

Abstract

Attracting overseas scientists back to their home countries is an important scientific policy in the era of globalization. The returnee scientists not only have the potential to make high academic achievements by themselves but are also expected to influence other scientists. Using a data-set of 1,006 scientists from Chinese State Key Laboratories, this study finds that recruiting young returnee scientists has a positive effect on the number of their peer’s highly-cited articles. It is also found that the peer effect is not achieved through the promotion of international collaborations of local scientists. It may be realized through other mechanisms, such as knowledge spillovers. As shown in the heterogeneity analysis, the adaptation of returnee scientists and the absorptive capacity of local scientists have an impact on the peer effects of the returnees, which reflects that knowledge dissemination and absorption play significant roles in the returnee’s peer effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Yang & Xinlan Cai & Tingsong Li, 2022. "Peer effects of the young returnee scientists: Evidence from the state key laboratories in China [Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(5), pages 739-750.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:5:p:739-750.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:5:p:739-750.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.