IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i6p883-886..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“The Politics of Pure Science” Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • David Kaldewey
  • Désirée Schauz

Abstract

On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Daniel Greenberg’s The Politics of Pure Science, we discuss trajectories of 20th century science policy concepts. Statistical analyses of digitized text corpora shed light on how ‘basic research’ became the predominant concept during World War II and in the postwar decades. In contrast to the 19th century ideal of pure science, ‘basic research’ conveys both the promise of utility and the promise of autonomy. The historical concept succeeded to bridge the gap between political and industrial expectations on the one hand and the uncertainty of the research endeavor on the other hand. Despite the more recent criticism toward the ideal of basic research, our analysis indicates that the very same concept remains relevant in normal science communication.

Suggested Citation

  • David Kaldewey & Désirée Schauz, 2017. "“The Politics of Pure Science” Revisited," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 883-886.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:883-886.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scx060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:6:p:883-886.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.