IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v40y2012i3p340-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education and support for scientists and elected officials in public policy decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy L. O'Brien

Abstract

This paper uses survey data from the United States to examine the relationship between education and public support for scientific experts and elected leaders in knowledge-intensive policy decisions. Results show that most individuals agree that scientists should have more influence than elected leaders over public policy related to global warming, stem cell research, genetically modified food, and nuclear energy. However, compared to those with less schooling, college graduates are up to nearly three times more likely to express the minority opinion that elected leaders should have policy priority. The analysis shows that this pattern results primarily from college graduates' increased support for elected officials rather than decreased support for scientists. Findings provide evidence for democratic theory, and more generally, highlight the value of incorporating political theory in empirical research on science and public policy. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy L. O'Brien, 2012. "Education and support for scientists and elected officials in public policy decisions," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 340-353, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2012:i:3:p:340-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scs112
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:40:y:2012:i:3:p:340-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.