IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v37y2010i6p401-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural changes in industrial R&D in Europe and the US: towards a new model?

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Foray
  • Stéphane Lhuillery

Abstract

We analyse the structural changes that have characterised the organisation of industrial R&D over the last 25 years. Taking Mowery's work (Industrial and Corporate Change, 2009, 18(1), 1–50) on the US as a starting point, we reconsider the different aspects of structural change he examined, discuss their impact and the overall logic underlying them. We then examine Europe to discover to what extent these structural changes have occurred in recent years. While a certain structural evolution is perceptible, it is not on the same scale as that analysed for the US. Finally, we consider the extent to which the new structures are more or less ‘efficient’ than previous ones. We conclude with the implications for R&D and innovation policy implications. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Foray & Stéphane Lhuillery, 2010. "Structural changes in industrial R&D in Europe and the US: towards a new model?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(6), pages 401-412, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:37:y:2010:i:6:p:401-412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234210X508606
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2022. "Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2016. "Sector dynamics and demographics of top R&D firms in the global economy," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-06, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Pietro-Moncada- Paternò-Castello, 2016. "EU corporate R&D intensity gap: Structural features calls for a better understanding of industrial dynamics," JRC Research Reports JRC103361, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Nicola Grassano, 2022. "The EU vs US corporate R&D intensity gap: investigating key sectors and firms [A primer on innovation and growth]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 19-38.
    5. Maé Geymond, 2020. "The influence of local institutional and historical frameworks on a globalized industry: The case of the pharmaceutical industry in France and Quebec," Post-Print halshs-02900915, HAL.
    6. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Sara Amoroso & Michele Cincera, 0. "Corporate R&D intensity decomposition: different data, different results?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 458-473.
    7. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Peter Voigt, 2010. "Proceedings of CONCORD 2010: 2nd European Conference on Corporate R&D "An Engine for Growth, a Challenge for European Policy". Academic Forum - Summary Report," JRC Research Reports JRC60863, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Maé Geymond, 2020. "The influence of local institutional and historical frameworks on a globalized industry: The case of the pharmaceutical industry in France and Quebec," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20011, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    9. Maé Geymond, 2020. "The influence of local institutional and historical frameworks on a globalized industry: The case of the pharmaceutical industry in France and Quebec," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02900915, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:37:y:2010:i:6:p:401-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.