IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v32y2005i3p174-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science and democracy in a globalizing world: challenges for American foreign policy

Author

Listed:
  • Clark A Miller

Abstract

The ideals of reason and freedom have long occupied central positions in the diplomatic imagination of the United States, leading US foreign policy to emphasize science and democracy as key elements in the fashioning of global order in the 20th century. At the beginning of the 21st century, however, the combination of science and democracy seems an increasingly ambivalent source of authority and inspiration. Advances in science and technology threaten to erode the self-determination of democratic societies, while new calls for the democratization of global governance raise difficult questions regarding the power and legitimacy of science and other forms of expertise in international institutions. This paper seeks to open a new dialogue on the conceptual underpinnings of US foreign policy and the potential for fashioning new commitments to reason and freedom that can strengthen both democratic governance and the management of rapid scientific and technological change in contemporary world affairs. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark A Miller, 2005. "Science and democracy in a globalizing world: challenges for American foreign policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 174-186, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:32:y:2005:i:3:p:174-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154305781779551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:32:y:2005:i:3:p:174-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.