Government-sponsored industry-university cooperative research: an analysis of cooperative research center evaluation approaches
AbstractEx-ante, interim and outcome evaluation approaches used at the program, center and project-level of analysis for four separate co-operative research center initiatives are examined. Center initiatives have received much evaluative scrutiny since 1980, particularly interim and outcome assessments. The modified peer-review technique has most use. The strengths and weaknesses of novel approaches and their applicability to more traditional research funding schemes are discussed. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Research Evaluation.
Volume (Year): 9 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 (April)
Contact details of provider:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Toker, Umut & Gray, Denis O., 2008. "Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers," Research Policy, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 309-329, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.