IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v7y1998i3p141-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer review evaluation of proposals in the biotechnology programme of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Alfredo Aguilar
  • Torbjörn Ingemansson
  • Stéphane Hogan
  • Etienne Magnien

Abstract

The first part of this paper describes the evaluation procedure or peer review undertaken by the European Union biotechnology programme. The second part assesses the evaluation procedure, through an analysis of the responses to a questionnaire sent to all experts who have participated in the evaluation of proposals for the current biotechnology programme of the Fourth Framework Programme (1994–98). The overall feedback from evaluators is of general satisfaction. Panel discussions have sometimes led to policy-making, for instance, in the ‘clustering’ of research initiatives with a potential for synergy and wider spin-offs. Evaluation reports have triggered daring initiatives to cross-link new technology trends with the needs of a diverse community of users. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfredo Aguilar & Torbjörn Ingemansson & Stéphane Hogan & Etienne Magnien, 1998. "Peer review evaluation of proposals in the biotechnology programme of the European Union," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 141-146, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:3:p:141-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/7.3.141
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:7:y:1998:i:3:p:141-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.