IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v23y2013i1p33-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External funding, efficiency and productivity growth in public research: the case of the Italian National Research Council

Author

Listed:
  • Greta Falavigna
  • Alessandro Manello

Abstract

This article presents an application of the Directional Output Distance Function (DODF) model to measure the internal performances of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Research institutes are seen as Decision Making Units (DMUs), which produce two different kinds of scientific outputs using inputs. We consider some outputs more important from a scientific point of view than others, which we refer to as bad. Financial constraints, recently imposed by the government, do not allow the institutes to freely dispose of their output portfolio, and bad outputs have to be produced in order to obtain external funds. Using the DODF framework it is possible to estimate the effect of fund cuts in terms of potential scientific products lost. By applying the Malmquist--Luenberger indexes we produce evidence on the trend of Total Factor Productivity (TFP) after the 2003 internal restructuring process. A comparison of results within the standard efficiency framework is provided and the big differences that emerge allow us to draw alternative conclusions on the recent evidence. Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Greta Falavigna & Alessandro Manello, 2013. "External funding, efficiency and productivity growth in public research: the case of the Italian National Research Council," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 33-47, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:33-47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvt026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Coccia & Greta Falavigna & Alessandro Manello, 2015. "The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 151-168, January.
    2. Juan Aparicio & Jose Manuel Cordero & Carlos Díaz-Caro, 2020. "Efficiency and productivity change of regional tax offices in Spain: an empirical study using Malmquist–Luenberger and Luenberger indices," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1403-1434, September.
    3. Greta Falavigna & Alessandro Manello, "undated". "Labour productivity and social network metrics in scientific research," CERIS Working Paper 201418, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:33-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.