IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v20y2011i4p313-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TEKES impact goals, logic model and evaluation of socio-economic effects

Author

Listed:
  • Jari Hyvärinen

Abstract

This article uses meta analysis and a meta logic model to summarize and explain those impacts which can be demonstrated by using existing results of evaluation studies concerning public research, development, and innovation (R&D&I) funding in Finland. The methodology for developing the detailed logic of impacts is based on additionality theory, the TEKES impact model, and a logic model of socio-economic effects. Findings are remarkable because in existing literature of logic models for R&D&I those links between parts of the model are incompletely explained scientifically in most cases. The approach to meta logic models and meta analysis in this paper, which could be duplicated for other countries, shows what can be explained by scientific foundations. The aim is also to review where the understanding of impacts of public funding for Finland is still missing or incomplete, and needs more research. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jari Hyvärinen, 2011. "TEKES impact goals, logic model and evaluation of socio-economic effects," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 313-323, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:313-323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820211X13164389670220
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:313-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.