IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v20y2011i3p255-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of impact

Author

Listed:
  • John D Brewer

Abstract

Impact is at one and the same time an object of derision and acclaim, anxiety and confidence. It is a troubled terrain, discussed from quite different directions, and there seems little prospect of developing a common conversation between those who traverse it This reflective paper seeks to outline a common core of questions that define the impact of impact. While it offers no answers to them, it establishes the grounds on which the debate can at least be taken forward in the future. These questions are: What is impact? Impact for whom? What are the domains in which it is displayed? What are its indicators? How is it measured? Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • John D Brewer, 2011. "The impact of impact," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 255-256, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:255-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820211X12941371876869
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christina Boswell & Katherine Smith, 2017. "Rethinking policy ‘impact’: four models of research-policy relations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Reed, M.S. & Ferré, M. & Martin-Ortega, J. & Blanche, R. & Lawford-Rolfe, R. & Dallimer, M. & Holden, J., 2021. "Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    3. A. Gaunand & L. Colinet & P.-B. Joly & M. Matt, 2022. "Counting what really counts? Assessing the political impact of science," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 699-721, June.
    4. Matteo Pedrini & Valentina Langella & Mario Alberto Battaglia & Paola Zaratin, 2018. "Assessing the health research’s social impact: a systematic review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 1227-1250, March.
    5. Hafidza Baharum & Aniza Ismail & Zainudin Awang & Lisa McKenna & Roszita Ibrahim & Zainah Mohamed & Nor Haty Hassan, 2023. "Validating an Instrument for Measuring Newly Graduated Nurses’ Adaptation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Ecker, Brigitte & Brunner, Philipp & Christmann-Budian, Stephanie & Fischl, Iris & Gassler, Helmut & Gogola, Gerald & Hartmann, Ernst & Heckl, Eva & Kaufmann, Peter & Krabel, Stefan & Mayer, Katja & M, 2019. "Österreichischer Forschungs- und Technologiebericht 2019," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 210638.
    7. Vučković Dijana & Pekovic Sanja & Popović Stevo & Janinovic Jovana, 2023. "Assessing the Appraisal of Research Quality in Social Sciences and Humanities: A Case Study of the University of Montenegro," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 131-152, September.
    8. Taehyee Um & Taekyung Kim & Namho Chung, 2020. "How does an Intelligence Chatbot Affect Customers Compared with Self-Service Technology for Sustainable Services?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:255-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.