IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v16y2007i4p331-339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking national biotechnology policy across Europe: a systems approach using quantitative and qualitative indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Reiss
  • Iciar Dominguez Lacasa

Abstract

Expectations that biotechnology will become a major contributor to economic growth and impact on quality of life explain its high priority on the political agenda of EU Member States. Theoretical advances in understanding innovation processes and instruments for innovation policy have created an increasing demand for empirical tools to develop policy from a systems perspective. This paper aims to provide policy-makers with tools to assist in biotechnology policy-making. Key aspects considered are: the systemic nature of the innovation process in biotechnology; the different policy areas involved in its promotion; and the time lag between policy action and potential policy outcomes. The benchmarking approach combines quantitative and qualitative indicators in order to assess policy activity in relevant policy areas and the achievement of policy goals. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Reiss & Iciar Dominguez Lacasa, 2007. "Benchmarking national biotechnology policy across Europe: a systems approach using quantitative and qualitative indicators," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 331-339, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:331-339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820207X263600
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:4:p:331-339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.