IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v11y2002i3p119-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactive peer review as a productive evaluation process

Author

Listed:
  • M A T de Silva
  • Geethika Yapa
  • E Dilip de Silva

Abstract

Difficulties of research evaluation in a small country — Sri Lanka — with a limited pool of scientific expertise has led to peer review process innovations, where an interactive process has emerged. Three differently managed research grant schemes using this are described. The effectiveness of these evaluation techniques depend on the extent to which researchers are involved with reviewers in the process, and on the context in which the research objectives are defined. Outstanding success has been achieved when both conditions were satisfied in a research programme. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • M A T de Silva & Geethika Yapa & E Dilip de Silva, 2002. "Interactive peer review as a productive evaluation process," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 119-128, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:119-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154402781776817
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:3:p:119-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.