Within the past few years several articles have suggested that returns on large equity portfolios may contain a significant predictable component at horizons three to six years. Subsequently, the tests used in these analyses have been criticized (appropriately) for having widely misunderstood size and power, rendering the conclusions inappropriate. This criticism, however, has not focused on the data, it addresses the properties of the tests. In this article we adopt a subjectivist analysis--treating the data as fixed--to ascertain whether the data have anything to say about the permanent-temporary decomposition. The data speak clearly and they tell us that for all intents and purposes, stock prices follow a random walk. Article published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Financial Studies in its journal, The Review of Financial Studies.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Oxford University Press for Society for Financial Studies in its journal Review of Financial Studies.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)