IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v35y2022i4p1813-1867..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Shareholders Disagree: Trading after Shareholder Meetings

Author

Listed:
  • Sophia Zhengzi Li
  • Ernst Maug
  • Miriam Schwartz-Ziv

Abstract

This paper analyzes how trading after shareholder meetings changes the composition of the shareholder base. Analyzing daily trades, we find that mutual funds reduce their holdings if their votes are opposed to the voting outcome. Trading volume is high even when stock prices do not change, peaks on the meeting date, and remains high up to four weeks after shareholder meetings. The results support models based on differences of opinion that predict that shareholders’ beliefs may diverge more after observing voting outcomes. Hence, trading after meetings creates a more homogeneous shareholder base, which has important implications for corporate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophia Zhengzi Li & Ernst Maug & Miriam Schwartz-Ziv, 2022. "When Shareholders Disagree: Trading after Shareholder Meetings," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(4), pages 1813-1867.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:35:y:2022:i:4:p:1813-1867.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhab059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Büchel, Berno & Mechtenberg, Lydia & Wagner, Alexander F., 2023. "When Do Proxy Advisors Improve Corporate Decisions?," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277704, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Meirowitz, Adam & Pi, Shaoting, 2022. "Voting and trading: The shareholder’s dilemma," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 1073-1096.
    3. Laurent Bouton & Aniol Llorente-Saguer & Antonin Macé & Adam Meirowitz & Shaoting Pi & Dimitrios Xefteris, 2022. "Public Information as a Source of Disagreement Among Shareholders," NBER Working Papers 30757, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Burkart, Mike & Zhong, Hongda, 2023. "Equity issuance methods and dilution," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117895, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Mike Burkart & Hongda Zhong, 2023. "Equity Issuance Methods and Dilution," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 78-130.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:35:y:2022:i:4:p:1813-1867.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.