IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v35y2022i4p1775-1812..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distortions and Efficiency in Production Economies with Heterogeneous Beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Heyerdahl-Larsen
  • Johan Walden

Abstract

We study consumption, savings, and asset prices in economies with disagreement and production, focusing on settings with real effects of disagreement. Aggregate savings may be significantly distorted under disagreement, possibly related to the undersaving puzzle. In the production economy, mispricing mainly manifests itself in idiosyncratic risk, in contrast to the exchange economy, where the risk-free rate and expected return on the market may be distorted. Potential policy implications include the introduction of investment taxes or subsidies. Our results highlight the real effects of disagreement in financial markets, and the differences between economies with and without production.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Heyerdahl-Larsen & Johan Walden, 2022. "Distortions and Efficiency in Production Economies with Heterogeneous Beliefs," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(4), pages 1775-1812.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:35:y:2022:i:4:p:1775-1812.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhab068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bing Han & David Hirshleifer & Johan Walden, 2023. "Visibility Bias in the Transmission of Consumption Beliefs and Undersaving," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(3), pages 1647-1704, June.
    2. Eduardo Dávila, 2023. "Optimal Financial Transaction Taxes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(1), pages 5-61, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G0 - Financial Economics - - General
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • D51 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Exchange and Production Economies
    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:35:y:2022:i:4:p:1775-1812.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.