IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revfin/v6y2002i3p277-290..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Preferences Heterogeneity: Evidence from Asset Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Doron Kliger
  • Ori Levy

Abstract

Using asset market data, as well as theoretical relations between investors’ preferences, option-implied, risk-neutral, probability distribution functions (PDFs,) and index-implied, actual, PDFs, this paper extracts a time-series of investors’ relative risk aversion (RRA) functions. Based on results recently derived by Benninga and Mayshar (2000), these functions are used to recover the evolution of risk preferences heterogeneity. Applying non-parametric estimation on European call options written on the S & P500 index, we find that: (i) the RRA functions are decreasing; and (ii) the constructed risk preferences heterogeneity series is positively correlated in a static, as well as a dynamic, setup with a prevalent proxy for investors heterogeneity, namely, the spread between auction- and market-yields of Treasury bills. JEL classification: D81, G12, G13.

Suggested Citation

  • Doron Kliger & Ori Levy, 2002. "Risk Preferences Heterogeneity: Evidence from Asset Markets," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 6(3), pages 277-290.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:6:y:2002:i:3:p:277-290.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1022069113893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Byung Jin & Kim, Tong Suk, 2006. "Option-implied risk preferences: An extension to wider classes of utility functions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 180-198, May.
    2. Kang, Byung Jin & Kim, Tong Suk, 2008. "Empirical risk aversion functions-estimates and assessment of their reliability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 1123-1138, December.
    3. Douglas W. Blackburn & William N. Goetzmann & Andrey D. Ukhov, 2009. "Risk Aversion and Clientele Effects," NBER Working Papers 15333, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Gurevich, Gregory & Kliger, Doron & Levy, Ori, 2009. "Decision-making under uncertainty - A field study of cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1221-1229, July.
    5. Ting-Huan Chang, 2011. "Risk preference and trading motivation measurement due to moneyness: evidence from the S&P 500 Index option market," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(14), pages 1049-1057.
    6. Gee, C., 2007. "Risky Choice and Type-Uncertainty in "Deal or No Deal?"," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0758, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    7. Douglas W. Blackburn & Andrey D. Ukhov, 2013. "Individual vs. Aggregate Preferences: The Case of a Small Fish in a Big Pond," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 470-484, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revfin:v:6:y:2002:i:3:p:277-290.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eufaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.