IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v22y2000i2p477-498..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Adoption and Its Impact on Production Performance of Dairy Operations

Author

Listed:
  • Hisham S. El-Osta
  • Mitchell J. Morehart

Abstract

Data from the 1993 Agricultural Resource Management Study were used to examine the impact of technology adoption on production performance of a sample of dairy farms. Findings showed that the adoption of a capital- or a management-intense technology would measurably lower the likelihood of a farmer being in the lowest quartile of production performance. The economic costs of milk production by the top-performance group were estimated to be 53% lower than those by the low-performance group, providing evidence of the importance of improved production practices to the viability of many dairy operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisham S. El-Osta & Mitchell J. Morehart, 2000. "Technology Adoption and Its Impact on Production Performance of Dairy Operations," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 477-498.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:22:y:2000:i:2:p:477-498.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1058-7195.00034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anjani Kumar & Ashok K. Mishra & Sunil Saroj & Vinay K. Sonkar & Ganesh Thapa & Pramod K. Joshi, 2020. "Food safety measures and food security of smallholder dairy farmers: Empirical evidence from Bihar, India," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 363-384, June.
    2. Alvarez, Antonio & del Corral, Julio & Tauer, Loren W., 2012. "Modeling Unobserved Heterogeneity in New York Dairy Farms: One-Stage versus Two-Stage Models," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-11, December.
    3. du Toit, J.P. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Ramroop, S., 2010. "Factors influencing the long-term competitiveness of commercial milk producers: evidence from panel data in East Griqualand, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 49(1), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Johnson, Rachel J. & Doye, Damona G. & Lalman, David L. & Peel, Derrell S. & Raper, Kellie Curry, 2008. "Adoption Of Best Management Practices In Stocker Cattle Production," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6827, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Camilo Olaya, 2015. "Cows, agency, and the significance of operational thinking," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 183-219, October.
    6. Rees, Lisa & Parcell, Joseph L. & Patterson, David J. & Smith, Michael F. & Poock, Scott, 2010. "Beef Reproductive Technology Adoption- Impact of Production Risk and Capitals," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56492, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Uter, Zachary, 2023. "Economic Assessment of Automated Milking Systems in Minnesota," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 335419, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Khanal, Aditya R. & Gillespie, Jeffrey M., 2011. "Adoption and Profitability of Breeding Technologies on United States Dairy Farms," 2011 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2011, Corpus Christi, Texas 98574, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:22:y:2000:i:2:p:477-498.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.