IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v15y1993i3p417-429..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of the Integrated Farm Management Option for Corn and Wheat Rotations

Author

Listed:
  • Penelope L. Diebel
  • Jeffery R. Williams

Abstract

The Integrated Farm Management Program Option (IFMPO) of the 1990 farm bill is designed to increase crop management flexibility and to promote the use of resource-conserving crops. Economic analysis of this program indicates that although the current format provides flexibility, it provides little economic incentive to adopt resource-conserving crop rotations. A potential change to the IFMPO that would provide the economic incentives needed for adoption of resource-conserving crop rotations is limited to haying or grazing rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Penelope L. Diebel & Jeffery R. Williams, 1993. "An Economic Analysis of the Integrated Farm Management Option for Corn and Wheat Rotations," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 15(3), pages 417-429.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:15:y:1993:i:3:p:417-429.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swinton, Scott M. & Clark, David S., 1994. "Farm-Level Evaluation of Alternative Policy Approaches to Reduce Nitrate Leaching from Midwest Agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 66-74, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:15:y:1993:i:3:p:417-429.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.