IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rasset/v13y2023i3p579-614..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Returns Out of Sample: A Naïve Model Averaging Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Huafeng (Jason) Chen
  • Liang Jiang
  • Weiwei Liu
  • Hui Chen

Abstract

We propose a naïve model averaging (NMA) method that averages the OLS out-of-sample forecasts and the historical means and produces mostly positive out-of-sample R2s for the variables significant in sample in forecasting market returns. Surprisingly, more sophisticated weighting schemes that combine the predictive variable and historical mean do not consistently perform better. With unstable economic relations and a limited sample size, sophisticated methods may lead to overfitting or be subject to more estimation errors. In such situations, our simple methods may work better. Model misspecification, rather than declining return predictability, likely explains the predictive performance of the NMA method. (JEL G12, G11)Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Website next to the link to the final published paper online.

Suggested Citation

  • Huafeng (Jason) Chen & Liang Jiang & Weiwei Liu & Hui Chen, 2023. "Predicting Returns Out of Sample: A Naïve Model Averaging Approach," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 579-614.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rasset:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:579-614.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rapstu/raac021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rasset:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:579-614.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/raps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.