IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v40y2010i3p357-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Simeon
  • Beryl A. Radin

Abstract

This article illustrates the challenges involved in preparing a systematic comparison of two federal countries. It examines questions as to what explains similarities and differences in federal systems. It rejects any single-variable approach to explaining federalism but gives primacy to ideas and to institutions. While there are fundamental differences in founding ideas and historical legacies, there are major similarities between these two federations. We conclude this analysis by underlining the value of comparison. Comparison helps clarify explanations for both variation and similarity, corrects misconceived perceptions of differences, and suggests areas of learning from one another. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Simeon & Beryl A. Radin, 2010. "Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 357-365, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:40:y:2010:i:3:p:357-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjq008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:40:y:2010:i:3:p:357-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.