IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/polsoc/v40y2021i1p1-18..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction: policy integration and institutional capacity: theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges
[Toward a processual understanding of policy integration]

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Domorenok
  • Paolo Graziano
  • Laura Polverari

Abstract

The issue of institutional capacity has received increased attention in the research on policy integration, bringing about the proliferation of conceptions aimed at capturing the linkage between cross-sectoral aspects of policy designs and the specific attributes that governmental institutions and processes should possess in order to effectively formulate and implement integrated policies. This article contributes to reducing conceptual and analytical fragmentation in this field by elaborating on the different dimensions which compose the broadly defined ‘institutional capacity’ and outlining its link with policy integration. More specifically, our objective is threefold. First, we elaborate on the theoretical and conceptual accounts of institutional capacity with particular regard to integrated policy designs, suggesting an analytical framework that unpacks the different dimensions of institutional capacity through a range of empirical indicators. Second, we discuss the analytical, conceptual and empirical challenges that arise with the study of institutional capacities for policy integration, drawing also on the main findings provided by the contributions to the Thematic Issue. Third, we suggest some promising venues for future research and collect a number of policy-relevant recommendations on institutional capacity, policy integration and policy effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Introduction: policy integration and institutional capacity: theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges [Toward a processual understanding of policy integration]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 1-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:40:y:2021:i:1:p:1-18.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14494035.2021.1902058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:polsoc:v:40:y:2021:i:1:p:1-18.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.