IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v44y2024i1p1-27..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How (Not) to Break Up: Constituent Power and Alternative Pathways to Scottish Independence

Author

Listed:
  • Raffael N Fasel
  • Shona Wilson Stark

Abstract

In October 2022, the UK Supreme Court unanimously held that the Scottish Parliament lacks the power to legislate for a second referendum on Scottish independence (Indyref 2) absent an enabling Order by the UK government under section 30 of the Scotland Act 1998. With no such Order forthcoming, alternative pathways to Indyref 2 are being investigated. In this article, we examine two such potential pathways—a plebiscitary election and an unauthorised referendum—through the lens of constituent power. We argue that both pathways are theoretically available if one accepts (as we argue) that the Scottish people is the bearer of constituent power. However, we conclude that there are significant obstacles dotting both potential pathways, and as such the only feasible route to internationally recognised statehood for Scotland is via political negotiation.

Suggested Citation

  • Raffael N Fasel & Shona Wilson Stark, 2024. "How (Not) to Break Up: Constituent Power and Alternative Pathways to Scottish Independence," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 1-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:1-27.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqad022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:44:y:2024:i:1:p:1-27.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.