IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxjlsj/v42y2022i3p818-842..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative Overreach, Adaptation and Administrative Re-regulation in Environmental Law

Author

Listed:
  • Ole W Pedersen

Abstract

This article interrogates the use of regulatory position statements (RPSs) by the Environment Agency. Through an RPS, the Environment Agency undertakes to take no enforcement action against an operator in circumstances that ordinarily constitutes a breach of the law. The article argues that RPSs serve several important functions, chief among which is to respond to regulatory overreach, which arises when legislators enact comprehensive statutory instruments to deal with complex and technical matters such as environmental protection. Beyond responding to regulatory overreach, the RPSs also serve to provide regulators with a regulatory tool that allows flexible and swift changes to the regulatory regime when faced with unforeseen challenges. Although their informal enactment suggests otherwise, the RPSs have significant ‘law-like’ implications, giving rise to a regulatory hybrid instrument, which is neither law or policy nor a rule or a discretionary power. Moreover, even if RPSs serve to disapply important statutory controls, they impose a range of additional and vague regulatory conditions and requirements. RPSs therefore contribute to a regulatory system which fluctuates between regulation, deregulation and re-regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ole W Pedersen, 2022. "Legislative Overreach, Adaptation and Administrative Re-regulation in Environmental Law," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 818-842.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:42:y:2022:i:3:p:818-842.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ojls/gqac005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxjlsj:v:42:y:2022:i:3:p:818-842.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ojls .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.