Fiscal Decentralization and Growing Regional Disparities in Rural China: Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Services
AbstractThis paper provides evidence of inter-regional and inter-sectoral inequality in China by comparing local government provision of social services. An examination of a number of education and health status indicators reveals large disparities in the level and quality of service provision across regions, with service provision in poorer regions falling far short of targets enunciated in state policy. Fiscal centralization has weakened the capacity of government to effect equalization across regions. As the fiscal system moved towards self-financing, fiscal pressures particularly intensified for the county level, whose expenditure burdens have generally been increasing. With higher level governments themselves under severe fiscal strain and in no position to subsidize services, rural governments are forced to seek supplementary funding off budget, by imposing a variety of fees and levies. In poor regions, however, access to off-budget resources is limited, resulting in lower levels of service provided and amplification of regional inequalities. Copyright 1995 by Oxford University Press.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Oxford Review of Economic Policy.
Volume (Year): 11 (1995)
Issue (Month): 4 (Winter)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://oxrep.oupjournals.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page. reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.