IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v72y2020i2p391-411..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The big trade-off between efficiency and equity—is it there?

Author

Listed:
  • Torben M Andersen
  • Jonas Maibom

Abstract

Widely quoted cross-country evidence finds income to be negatively associated with inequality, suggesting the absence of a trade-off between efficiency and equity. Such evidence implicitly assumes that all countries are at the frontier in an efficiency–equity space. We refute this for most OECD countries, and find a best-practice frontier displaying a trade-off. In accordance with standard economic theory, a larger tax burden is associated with lower efficiency and more equity. Interestingly, the trade-off has not become steeper over the sample period 1970–2014. Country positions differ significantly with some being consistently at the frontier, while others are well inside the opportunity set.

Suggested Citation

  • Torben M Andersen & Jonas Maibom, 2020. "The big trade-off between efficiency and equity—is it there?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(2), pages 391-411.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:72:y:2020:i:2:p:391-411.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpz040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stavros A. Drakopoulos, 2024. "Value Judgements, Positivism and Utility Comparisons in Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(3), pages 423-437, January.
    2. Hans Pitlik & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2022. "Kurzexpertise zu Abgabensystem und Ausgabenstrukturen im internationalen Vergleich. Ausgangssituation und Reformbedarf," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67988, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • E02 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Institutions and the Macroeconomy
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:72:y:2020:i:2:p:391-411.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.