IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v57y2005i1p70-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Prisoners' Dilemma and city-centre traffic

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Sissons Joshi
  • Vijay Joshi
  • Roger Lamb

Abstract

Such problems as inner-city traffic congestion and pollution are often asserted to be examples of the n-person Prisoners' Dilemma Game (PD), but there is a dearth of empirical research that tests this assertion. 551 car owners in Oxford responded to three pairs of alternatives designed as traffic versions of the four outcomes of the PD, by stating which alternative in each pair they preferred. Only 2% of respondents showed the full set of preferences which fit the PD. Four sets of preferences were common and accounted for 93% of responses suggesting that no single canonical game structure represents the traffic problem. The most common set of preferences, shown by 48% of respondents, fitted an 'Assurance Game'. The results imply that the current city-centre traffic problem may be in substantial part due to lack of assurance and trust rather than raw self-interest. The public policy implications of the results are discussed. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Sissons Joshi & Vijay Joshi & Roger Lamb, 2005. "The Prisoners' Dilemma and city-centre traffic," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 57(1), pages 70-89, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:57:y:2005:i:1:p:70-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpi006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:57:y:2005:i:1:p:70-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.