IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ooecxx/v2y2023ip428-42..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The informal carer experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: mental health, loneliness, and financial (in)-security

Author

Listed:
  • Edward J D
  • David Meads
  • Clare Gardiner

Abstract

Informal caring is associated with many negative outcomes. COVID-19 caused societal disruption, which may have disproportionately impacted carers. Reducing inequalities requires knowing whether, and how, carers were impacted. COVID-19 Understanding Society survey participants who were informal household carers (IHCs) were matched with a non-IHC comparison group. Differences between the groups were assessed for mental health (measured using General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-12), loneliness, subjective financial security, whether behind with mortgage/rent payments or bills, household wealth changes, and whether receiving universal credit (UC). A total of 1617 IHCs were matched with 6684 comparators. IHCs’ GHQ-12 scores were 0.613 points higher; they experienced greater loneliness and worse subjective financial security. IHCs were significantly more likely to experience decreased household wealth and receive UC, but not to be behind with bills. IHC outcomes remained worse than comparators in September 2021. Spending longer caring, caring for a partner, and not being employed were associated with worse outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward J D & David Meads & Clare Gardiner, 2023. "The informal carer experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: mental health, loneliness, and financial (in)-security," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pages 428-442.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ooecxx:v:2:y:2023:i::p:428-42.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ooec/odad085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ooecxx:v:2:y:2023:i::p:428-42.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ooec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.