IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/medlaw/v29y2021i4p661-687..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Medicalisation of Childbirth and Access to homebirth in the UK: Covid-19 and Beyond

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Nelson
  • Elizabeth C. Romanis

Abstract

In this article, we explore how the law has perpetuated the medicalisation of childbirth, and outline why this may limit the ability of birthing persons to access and opt for homebirth. We argue that this is inherently problematic because it restricts choice and autonomy in childbirth. We suggest that the widespread blanket withdrawals of homebirthing services by National Health Service trusts during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic serves as an illustrative example of the broader failure to recognise, both socially and legally, the significance of homebirth for some. We argue that, if framed correctly, the law has the potential to support, rather than restrict, choice regarding place of birth.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Nelson & Elizabeth C. Romanis, 2021. "The Medicalisation of Childbirth and Access to homebirth in the UK: Covid-19 and Beyond," Medical Law Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(4), pages 661-687.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:29:y:2021:i:4:p:661-687.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/medlaw/fwab040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:medlaw:v:29:y:2021:i:4:p:661-687.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/medlaw .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.