Separation of Powers and Appointee Ideology
AbstractThe traditional view of appointments to executive agencies is that the president has virtual carte blanche in the selection of personnel for his "team." Yet many formal models of appointment suggest that presidents must accommodate the policy preferences of senators when making nominations. Several empirical studies have confirmed that legislative preferences are a significant determinant of the ideology of appointees, but these studies have focused on appointments to the federal judiciary; the research has not addressed appointments to executive agencies. Appointments to executive agencies from 1936 to 1996 are examined, by employing a special sample of appointees to those positions--those who have served in Congress at some point in their careers. For these "bridging" individuals, it is possible to analyze strictly comparable measures of ideology for the appointees, their nominating presidents, and the senators who voted to confirm them. A linear regression analysis provides significant support for the hypothesis that appointee ideology is affected by variation in the ideological tilt in Congress. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Oxford University Press in its journal The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization.
Volume (Year): 20 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://jleo.oupjournals.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.