IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jiplap/v19y2024i1p32-42..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The treatment of electronic games copyright protection in Brazil: analysis of copyright law and software law application

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Aleixo Santos da Cruz
  • Jucimar Maia da Silva Junior
  • Silvia Regina Sampaio Freitas
  • Raimundo Correa de Oliveira
  • Ricardo da Silva Barboza

Abstract

Brazil is currently the 5th largest game industry market by number of players, with expected year-by-year revenue growth of 5 per cent. The electronic games industry has been growing exponentially in Brazil and globally, and a specific regulation that meets the sector’s unique needs has become increasingly necessary. The lack of a regulatory framework in the Brazilian legal system directly impacts the legal security of businesses involving electronic games, especially in relation to the IP rights vesting in such assets.Intense debates have been conducted about the legal nature of electronic games, whether they are audiovisual works, works of art, computer programs or all of them combined, and what legal framework applies to these works under Brazilian law. There are several approaches to this subject; apparently, more consensus has yet to be reached. The abundance of regulatory gaps and the patchwork of different legal documents undermine the legal categorization and, consequently, the protection of these assets under IP laws.Using a methodology of bibliographic review and exploratory research, this considers the current position of electronic games in Brazil. It also proposes a specific framework for this type of work that is not simply that of audiovisual work or software, thus seeking a point of intersection between the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Aleixo Santos da Cruz & Jucimar Maia da Silva Junior & Silvia Regina Sampaio Freitas & Raimundo Correa de Oliveira & Ricardo da Silva Barboza, 2024. "The treatment of electronic games copyright protection in Brazil: analysis of copyright law and software law application," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 32-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:32-42.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpad101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:32-42.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiplp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.