IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jieclw/v7y2004i4p801-838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The GATS and Regulatory Autonomy: A Case Study of Social Regulation of the Water Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Lang

Abstract

In June 2002, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights released a report entitled 'Liberalization of trade in services and human rights'. In this article, the author examines one of the concerns voiced in that report, that the GATS potentially affects the ability of governments to regulate the water industry in the pursuit of social objectives. This claim has been disputed by a number of other commentators. Taking both the claim and its critics on their own terms, he applies GATS non-discrimination articles to typical water sector regulation, to determine whether, and in what circumstances, such regulation potentially violates those provisions. He argues that one should view with some skepticism strong claims that the GATS does not restrict social regulation of the water sector, as they are often based on unjustifiably robust interpretations of the protective provisions of the GATS. At the same time, he identifies a number of promising argumentative strategies of potential use for those interested in protecting domestic regulatory autonomy in the water sector. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Lang, 2004. "The GATS and Regulatory Autonomy: A Case Study of Social Regulation of the Water Industry," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 801-838, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:7:y:2004:i:4:p:801-838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bronwen Morgan, 2006. "The North–South politics of necessity: regulating for basic rights between national and international levels," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 465-487, December.
    2. Olivier Cattaneo & Michael Engman & Sebastián Sáez & Robert M. Stern, 2010. "International Trade in Services : New Trends and Opportunities for Developing Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2476, December.
    3. Bronwen Morgan & Frank Trentmann, 2006. "Introduction: the politics of necessity," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 345-353, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:7:y:2004:i:4:p:801-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jiel .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.