IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jfinec/v21y2023i3p651-677..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intraday Trades Profile Estimation: An Intensity Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Alessio Sancetta

Abstract

The intraday trades profile is the expected intensity of a counting process where the counts measure the number of trades over an interval. It needs to capture the salient features of the trading activity, its spikes, and periods of relative quietness. This calls for an estimator with a time varying resolution that allows us to identify jumps. The problem can be recast as a regression one, using a fused Lasso penalty. The framework allows us to identify jumps within possibly thousands different locations within a day when the number of trading days at disposal is in the order of hundreds. This can be done without imposing any conditions on the counting process except for certain regularity conditions on the expected intensity. The empirical results suggest that much of the trading activity in some liquid futures can be captured by a deterministic seasonal component in the trade arrival process.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessio Sancetta, 2023. "Intraday Trades Profile Estimation: An Intensity Approach," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 651-677.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:21:y:2023:i:3:p:651-677.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jjfinec/nbab014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    algorithmic trading; asymptotic distribution; consistency; counting process; fused Lasso estimator;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:21:y:2023:i:3:p:651-677.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sofieea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.