IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jfinec/v15y2017i2p173-222..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation into Multivariate Variance Ratio Statistics and their Application to Stock Market Predictability

Author

Listed:
  • Seok Young Hong
  • Oliver Lintono
  • Hui Jun Zhang

Abstract

We propose several multivariate variance ratio statistics for “testing” the weak form Efficient Market Hypothesis and for measuring the direction and magnitude of departures from this hypothesis. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the statistics and scalar functions thereof under the null hypothesis that returns are unpredictable after a constant mean adjustment. We propose asymptotic standard errors that are robust to departures from the “no leverage” assumption of Lo and MacKinlay (1988), but are relatively simple and in particular do not require the selection of a bandwidth parameter. We show the limiting behavior of the statistic under a multivariate fads model and under a moderately explosive bubble process: these alternative hypotheses give opposite predictions with regards to the long-run value of the statistics. We apply the methodology to weekly returns for Center for Research in Security Prices size-sorted portfolios from 1962 to 2013 in three subperiods. We find evidence of a reduction of linear predictability in the most recent period, for small and medium cap stocks, but we still reject the multivariate null hypothesis in the most recent period. The main findings are not substantially affected by allowing for a common factor time varying risk premium.

Suggested Citation

  • Seok Young Hong & Oliver Lintono & Hui Jun Zhang, 2017. "An Investigation into Multivariate Variance Ratio Statistics and their Application to Stock Market Predictability," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 173-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:15:y:2017:i:2:p:173-222.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jjfinec/nbw014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fiorentini, Gabriele & Sentana, Enrique, 2021. "New testing approaches for mean–variance predictability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 516-538.
    2. Cho, Jin Seo & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2018. "Pythagorean generalization of testing the equality of two symmetric positive definite matrices," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 45-56.
    3. Chang, Jinyuan & Jiang, Qing & Shao, Xiaofeng, 2023. "Testing the martingale difference hypothesis in high dimension," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 972-1000.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bubbles; fads; martingale; momentum; predictability; power;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:15:y:2017:i:2:p:173-222.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sofieea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.