IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v50y2023i3p576-596..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent Effects of Budgeting for Gifts versus Personal Purchases

Author

Listed:
  • Yuna Choe
  • Christina Kan
  • Evan Polman
  • Amna Kirmani
  • Bernd H Schmitt
  • Amar Cheema

Abstract

Consumers often set budgets with the goal to minimize their spending. Contrary to this traditional interpretation, our research suggests that budgets can take on a different psychological meaning depending on whether the budget is for a personal or gift purchase. Across 11 studies, we find that consumers aim to spend below their budgets for personal purchases (budget minimizing) but aim to spend the entirety of their budgets for gift purchases (budget maximizing). We differentiate budget maximizing from spending maximizing, showing that gift purchasers are more likely to prefer “at-budget” than “above-budget” purchases. We also show that gift purchasers have weaker savings goals than personal purchasers—a difference that mediates the effect on their budget-minimizing and -maximizing tendencies. We explore multiple reasons that could explain why savings goals are less prevalent among gift purchasers and find an upstream role for price consciousness, guilt, and perceived specialness. Finally, we find that consumers’ preference for spending the entirety of their budgets on gifts was moderated by two separate factors: consumers’ budget slack and salience. Our research adds to the literatures on mental budgeting, gift giving, and self-other decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuna Choe & Christina Kan & Evan Polman & Amna Kirmani & Bernd H Schmitt & Amar Cheema, 2023. "Divergent Effects of Budgeting for Gifts versus Personal Purchases," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(3), pages 576-596.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:50:y:2023:i:3:p:576-596.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucad011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:50:y:2023:i:3:p:576-596.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.