IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v49y2022i4p634-656..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-to-Unlock Rewards: Leveraging Goals in Reward Systems to Increase Consumer Persistence
[Naiveté, Projection Bias, and Habit Formation in Gym Attendance]

Author

Listed:
  • Marissa A Sharif
  • Kaitlin Woolley

Abstract

Eight studies (N = 5,025) demonstrate that consumers persist more when they must complete a target number of goal-related actions before receiving continuous rewards (i.e., what we term work-to-unlock rewards) than when they receive continuous rewards for their effort right away (i.e., what we term work-to-receive rewards). The authors suggest that the motivating power of work-to-unlock rewards arises because these rewards (1) naturally encourage consumers to set an attainable goal to start earning rewards, motivating consumers initially through goal setting and (2) keep consumers engaged after reaching this goal due to low perceived progress in earning rewards. A work-to-unlock reward structure increases persistence relative to standard continuous rewards across a variety of consumer-relevant domains (e.g., exercising, flossing, evaluating products), and even when work-to-unlock rewards offer rewards of a lower magnitude. Further, a work-to-unlock reward structure outperforms other reward structures that encourage goal setting. Lastly, the authors identify a theoretically consistent boundary condition of this effect: the length of the unlocking period.

Suggested Citation

  • Marissa A Sharif & Kaitlin Woolley, 2022. "Work-to-Unlock Rewards: Leveraging Goals in Reward Systems to Increase Consumer Persistence [Naiveté, Projection Bias, and Habit Formation in Gym Attendance]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(4), pages 634-656.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:634-656.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucac007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2022:i:4:p:634-656.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.