IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v49y2022i2p252-267..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sizes Are Gendered: The Effect of Size Cues in Brand Names on Brand Stereotyping
[Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions]

Author

Listed:
  • Kuangjie Zhang
  • Shaobo (Kevin) Li
  • Sharon Ng

Abstract

Size cues are increasingly common in brand names (e.g., Xiaomi and Mini Cooper), but scant research has investigated whether and how brand name size cues influence consumers’ perceptions. This research shows that a brand name size cue can evoke gender associations, which subsequently affect consumers’ perceived warmth and competence of the target brand. A series of seven studies provide converging evidence that brands with a size cue of smallness in the name are perceived to be warmer but less competent, while those with a size cue of bigness are perceived to be less warm but more competent. A combination of measurement-of-mediation and moderation-of-process approaches provide support for the role of gender associations underlying the effect of brand name size cues on consumers’ brand perceptions. This research also shows that brand name size cues can have diverging effects on the perceived warmth of the brand versus of the product. Finally, this research rules out alternative accounts based on perceived market power and firm size.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuangjie Zhang & Shaobo (Kevin) Li & Sharon Ng, 2022. "Sizes Are Gendered: The Effect of Size Cues in Brand Names on Brand Stereotyping [Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 49(2), pages 252-267.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:252-267.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2022:i:2:p:252-267.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.