IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2021i4p682-708..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework of Brand Contestation: Toward Brand Antifragility

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Dietrich
  • Cristel Antonia Russell
  • Linda L Price
  • Zeynep Arsel

Abstract

The consumer literature on branding to date coalesces around the notion that brands are constantly contested. Brand contestation arises where the actions of consumer brand actors meet, and sometimes confront, those of the brands’ legal owners. This article integrates the extant branding research, a qualitative prestudy, and two complementary empirical studies to advance a theoretical process model of brand contestation. First, an in-depth analysis of thirty historical cases reveals its dynamics and how both the magnitude of contestation and the momentum of mobilization affect brand contestations’ scope and evolution. Second, interviews with upper-level marketing and branding executives add an emerging perspective that brand managers can use the energy generated by consumers’ contestation to develop antifragility—a brand’s ability to grow and thrive as a result of contestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Dietrich & Cristel Antonia Russell & Linda L Price & Zeynep Arsel, 2021. "A Framework of Brand Contestation: Toward Brand Antifragility," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 682-708.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:682-708.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:682-708.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.